It is child abuse.”ĭespite winning landmark rulings in Japan in 20, Morehouse alleges “there was no intent to offer justice … it does not matter how a child ends up with the abductor in Japan, they will not uphold laws and treaties to return children to their rightful home. This is not what a healthy, nurturing parent does. “Your whole life is now built on a foundation of lies. Imagine being a child and your mother steals you away to a foreign country and then tells you your father does not want you anymore, or that he is dead,” he said. “When the Seattle Consulate of Japan denied her passport request she simply went to the Japanese consulate in Portland, which issued her one in violation of passport issuance policy,” he said.Īssociates sometimes tell Morehouse that at least his son is safe with his mother. Passport and travel restraints in the court order to bar his ex-wife from leaving the state of Washington with Mochi had proven ineffectual. She had kidnapped our son to Japan,” he said. “Six days later, I received a phone call from the police that no parent wants to receive: My son and ex-wife had been reported missing. That was the last time Morehouse ever saw Mochi. In June 2010, he dropped him off for a week-long visit with his mother. He was granted sole custody of his 6 ½-year-old son “Mochi” Atomu Imoto Morehouse in the State of Washington in May 2007. “By creating a seminar that advised potential abductors how to circumvent a (convention-compliant) return order, the government of Japan exhibited a shocking and blatant disregard for this international agreement,” said Morehouse. An audio recording obtained by Jeffery Morehouse, executive director of “Bring Abducted Children Home,” formed in 2011, indicated that Tokyo was coaching its citizens about how to abduct their children to Japan and how to prevent their return. In mid-2018, for example, a public seminar took place in Paris organized by Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations. She added: “I am pleased to report that there is progress.” Tokyo’s double game “This is unacceptable and I am deeply concerned that, as a result, there is a pattern of Japan not complying with its obligations under the Convention,” Lawrence said while testifying at a recent US government hearing on international child abductions. “There is a serious flaw in Japan’s implementation of the convention,” said Suzanne Lawrence, a special advisor for children’s issues at the US State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs. Why should Japan be held to any less of a standard than North Korea? North Korea returned five of those 17 who were abducted nearly 40 years ago. “I agree with Prime Minister Abe,” said Collins. “And there should be no US economic or military assistance with Japan until Japan addresses the abduction issue. “Japan is non-compliant,” with the convention, Collins asserted, citing the abductions of about 400 US children since 1994.Īfter a February 2018 meeting with US President Donald Trump, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said: “There will be no economic assistance for North Korea until it addresses the abduction issue” – a reference to Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea to train its spies. Tokyo looks particularly dubious in light of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. “Japan must be held accountable for its disregard of fundamental parental rights and its continued support of these illegal abductions.” A shameful recordįor years, Japan has been one of the most intransigent countries regarding international parental child abductions – which is exactly how the US described Japan during a US Senate hearing in 2014. Tragedy of children abducted from dads and taken to Japan – Asia Times Close Search for:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |